What the result includes
- Net cash-back value after the annual fee
- Net points value after friction and the annual fee
- The difference under your redemption assumptions
- A reminder that point values are not cash guarantees
Compare simple cash with the point value you can realistically redeem.
← All credit-card toolsCompare both cards using the same spending and a point value you can actually redeem.
The cash-back card wins under your entered redemption assumptions. Change the point value and friction inputs before trusting the result.
Point values are not cash guarantees. Availability, transfer ratios, award pricing, expiration, and redemption habits can reduce realized value.
Compare a cash-back card with a points card using the same annual spending, annual fees, and a point value you can actually redeem.
Hold annual spend constant so a points card cannot win by imagining more travel than you take.
Use a redemption you can actually complete. Headline cents-per-point figures can depend on limited award space.
If you historically let points expire or redeem poorly, include that friction before trusting the points-card result.
Cash back is easier to value. Points can win when you reliably redeem them above a conservative rate after fees. Compare both with the same spending.
Enter a rate tied to a redemption you can repeat. If you take statement credit, start near one cent. Use a higher value only when you regularly book that travel.